"A magnetic push-pull tool is the correct choice when the load is ferrous, a viable attachment surface exists, and the task requires sustained, repositionable engagement — not simply because the load is made of steel."
The Four Selection Questions
Question 1 — Is the Load Ferrous?
A magnetic push-pull tool has no function on a non-ferrous load. Stainless steel grades vary considerably in magnetic response — some austenitic grades are effectively non-magnetic — and aluminium, non-ferrous castings, and composite components will not engage a magnetic interface. Confirm the load's material before bringing a magnetic tool to the task.
Question 2 — Is Magnetic Attachment Possible?
A ferrous load does not guarantee a usable magnetic attachment. The surface must present a viable contact point. Flat or gently curved surfaces allow the magnetic face to seat with adequate contact area. Sharply curved, ribbed, perforated, or heavily textured surfaces can reduce contact area to the point that attachment is unreliable, even on a ferrous load. Surface condition — coatings, rust, mill scale, oil, or debris — further reduces available magnetic engagement.
Question 3 — Is Continuous Engagement Required?
Some tasks require the guidance tool to remain attached and under control for an extended period — tracking a load through a multi-step positioning sequence. Others require only a brief, single contact. Magnetic tools are well suited to the first case. For the second, a brief mechanical contact — a hook, an L-head, or a tagline correction — may achieve the same result more simply.
Question 4 — Does the Task Require Fine Control at Close Range?
Taglines provide excellent gross swing and orientation control, but their long lever arm makes fine positioning at close range impractical. A push-pull tool — magnetic or mechanical — provides the close-range fine control that taglines cannot. In most complex lifts, the correct answer is both: a tagline for the early and mid-stages, a push-pull tool for the final approach.
The Five Methods Compared
| Method | Mechanical Basis | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic push-pull | Magnetic attraction to ferrous surface | Continuous, repositionable; rotation and fine correction | Requires ferrous material and viable surface |
| F-head push-pull | Mechanical contact against flat or flanged face | Works on non-ferrous and coated surfaces | Requires a stable flat contact face |
| L-head push-pull | Mechanical hooking against an edge or flange | Effective on structural edges; positive mechanical location | Limited use on flat, featureless surfaces |
| Hook-head / shackle tool | Mechanical engagement with existing lifting point | Positive engagement independent of surface condition | Requires an existing engagement point |
| Tagline | Tensioned line at safe standoff | Wide range of motion; effective for gross swing control | Coarse control only; not suited to fine close-range positioning |
The Sequential Decision Path
- Is the load ferrous? No → use F-head, L-head, hook, or tagline.
- Is there a viable flat or clean magnetic surface? No → use F-head, L-head, hook, or tagline.
- Is continuous engagement or rotation control needed? No → brief mechanical contact or tagline correction may suffice.
- Does the task require fine control at close range? No → tagline alone may be adequate.
If all four answer Yes, a magnetic push-pull tool is an appropriate engineering control. The next decision is which Load-It® MagHead configuration matches the specific task requirements.
Premium Engineering Consultation
Not sure which configuration fits the task?
PSC's Application Mapping Review examines the actual task — the load, the surface, the access conditions, and the operator's movement — and recommends the correct matched configuration.
Request a Load-It® Application Mapping Review Load-It® System →